Attorneys

Bradley Strickland Bradley Strickland

Bradley M. Strickland

Principal

Biography

An experienced litigator in Kramon & Graham's nationally recognized Commercial Litigation group, Brad represents clients throughout the country in high-value, complex matters involving commercial disputes, professional malpractice, first-party insurance claims, catastrophic personal injury, and toxic torts.

Brad has secured significant judgments and settlements for his clients, both plaintiffs and defendants. His experience includes cases involving multinational manufacturers in products liability class actions and multidistrict litigation, including lawsuits seeking over $1 billion in damages. Brad has also advised clients on product safety issues and product recalls. His engineering background gives him a unique perspective in complex litigation cases, particularly those involving toxic tort, mass tort, and products liability claims.

Brad's litigation experience includes the representation of individuals and business entities in complex commercial disputes, first-party insurance claims, and personal injury actions, including the representation of:

  • Individuals in life-altering personal injury matters
  • Individuals and businesses in multi-million dollar business and contract disputes
  • A leading property and casualty insurance company in first-party claims
  • Individuals and businesses in landlord-tenant disputes, in construction disputes, and in consumer protection claims
  • Local and multinational manufacturers in product liability class actions and multidistrict litigation in a wide variety of industries, including home construction materials, fencing, paints, automobiles, and construction equipment
  • Healthcare providers in medical malpractice and general litigation matters
  • A leading rail-based transportation supplier in Federal Employer's Liability Act litigation
  • Banks in garnishment matters
  • A Fortune 50 asbestos supplier in litigation across the country

Brad also has experience in representing international corporations in CPSC civil penalty matters and in advising business entities on proper product labeling and warnings.

Before joining the firm, Brad was a senior associate in the Washington D.C. office of a leading international law firm.


Recognition

Recognized in Best Lawyers: Commercial Litigation, since 2021

District of Columbia Courts' "Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll," Honoree, 2018

Readers' Choice Award, JD Supra, 2016, 2017, 2018


Service

Athletes Serving Athletes, Board of Directors

Business Volunteers Maryland, GIVE Fellowship, Class of 2022

The Aimee Copeland Foundation, former Board Member


Memberships

American Bar Association

Bar Association of Baltimore City

Federal Bar Association

International Association of Defense Counsel

Maryland State Bar Association

National Association of Railroad Trial Counsel


Events

Co-presenter, "Introduction to Federal Practice," Federal Bar Association - Maryland Chapter, 2019


Publications

Co-author, "Maryland Court of Special Appeals Affirms Trial Court's Decision that the Improper and Untimely Designation of Experts Results in Summary Judgment," The Defense Line, November, 2020

Co-author, "Increased Scrutiny for Cy Pres Provisions in Class Action Settlements," ALM Law Journal Newsletters, LJN's Product Liability Law & Strategy, October, 2017

Co-author, "Use of Pre-Clearance FDA Authorization Evidence in Medical Device Litigation," Alston & Bird LLP, October, 2017

Co-author, "Distracted Driving: Technology as a Double-Edged Sword," Law360, August, 2014

Co-author, "The Rule Against (Liability in) Perpetuity," ALM Law Journal Newsletters, LJN's Product Liability Law & Strategy, Vol. 32, No. 12, June, 2014

Author, "The Gift That Keeps On Giving (To Defendants)," Law360, December, 2013

Co-author, "To Stay Or Not To Stay GMO Labeling Cases?" Law360, December, 2013


Outside the Office

Brad is a sports enthusiast, and he particularly enjoys playing basketball.

Representative Matters

After a multi-day Frye-Reed evidentiary hearing, successfully achieved the exclusion of the plaintiffs' experts in two similarly situated cases in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. The exclusion of the experts resulted in summary judgment. The plaintiffs in the two cases alleged they developed MDS (and for one, AML) from their purported exposures to diesel exhaust that contained benzene while employed by the defendant. Plaintiffs offered a hemotologist and medical oncologist as a causation expert and an industrial hygienist expert. The Court excluded both experts, finding that in the former, the expert's testimony failed to meet the requirements of the Frye-Reed test and Rule 5-702, and that, in the latter, the expert's testimony failed to comply with the requirements of Rule 5-702. Because the experts' testimony was excluded, plaintiffs could not prove the defendant was negligent, and summary judgment was granted.

News

Publications

Events

Recognition

professional_detail.inc